Acceptability of Plastic Comb Foundation by Apis mellifera L.


          Laquidan, Reynaldo C. et al. 2009. The study was conducted at the Cordillera Integrated Agricultural Research Center (CIARC), Baguio City from November 12 to December 02, 2009. A total of nine (9) double-chamber standard colonies with three (3) replications arranged in random were used in this experiment. Result of the experiment showed that wax (T0) and plastic (T1) comb foundations were readily accepted in 72 hours (3 days after the introduction). Where, wax comb foundation had the widest and heaviest wax build-up recorded and plastic comb foundation had the least area and weight obtained. Likewise, wax building activity of the honeybee begun to decline in 288 hours (12 days after the introduction) on both treatments. Cost and return analysis suggest that wax comb foundation is most profitable during its first year than plastic comb foundation. However, plastic comb foundation could be more profitable in 5 years which is comparable with wax comb foundations.



BLACKISTON, Howland. 2001.  Beekeeping for Dummies. Wiley Publishing, Inc.
DADANT, C.P.  1997.  First Lessons in Beekeeping.  Revised Publication.  A Dadant Publication. Hamilton, Illinois.
DADANT and Sons.  1992.  The Hive and the Honeybee.  Hamilton, Illinois.  Page 392, 551.
CRANE, Eva.  1990.  Bees and Beekeeping:  Science, Practice and World Resources.  Ithaca, New York. Page 89-91.
GILLARD, Grant F.C.  March 2008.  Accelerating the Acceptance of Plastic Foundation.  American Bee Journal.  Volume 148.  No.3.
CONNOR, L.  November 2004.  Drone Production and Plastic Comb.  Bee Culture.
RIBBANDS, C.R.  1953.  The Behaviour and Social Life of Honeybees.  London, Bee Research Association.  New York.
RIBBANDS, C.R.  1952.  Division of Labour in the Honeybee Community.  London.  140:32-42.

Downloads:  Richard Underhill.
Date blog: December 2009.  5:16 pm

RAY, James.  May in the South.  American Bee Journal.  May 2003 issue. P. 375.